Lennon v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

527 F.2d 187 (1975)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Lennon v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
527 F.2d 187 (1975)

Facts

In 1968, John Lennon (plaintiff), a British national and a famous musician, pleaded guilty in a British court to possession of cannabis resin, a form of marijuana. The court fined Lennon £150. In 1971, Lennon and his wife, Yoko Ono, moved to New York. Due to Lennon’s criminal record, the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) (defendant) issued the couple temporary visas. When the visas expired, the INS notified Lennon that he would need to leave the country or face deportation. Lennon and Ono applied for third-preference status, a prerequisite to gaining permanent residence. Several days later, the INS initiated deportation proceedings. While the deportation proceedings were pending, the INS approved the couple’s petition for third-preference status. Lennon and Ono then applied for permanent residence. The immigration judge granted Ono’s application. However, the judge denied Lennon’s petition due to his British conviction for marijuana possession and ordered him deported. The Board of Immigration Appeals affirmed, and Lennon appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kaufman, C.J.)

Dissent (Mulligan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership