Leocal v. Ashcroft

543 U.S. 1 (2004)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Leocal v. Ashcroft

United States Supreme Court
543 U.S. 1 (2004)

  • Written by Christopher Bova, JD

Facts

Leocal (plaintiff) immigrated to the United States in 1980 and became a permanent resident in 1987. In January 2000, he was charged with two counts of DUI causing serious bodily injury under Florida law. He pleaded guilty to both counts and was sentenced to two and a half years in prison. In November 2000, the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) began removal proceedings pursuant to section 237(a) of the Immigration and Nationalization Act of 1952 (INA), which states that any alien is deportable if convicted of an aggravated felony. In October 2001, an immigration judge found him removable and the Board of Immigration Appeals affirmed. Leocal was removed to Haiti in November 2002. In June 2003, the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit dismissed his petition for review, and the Supreme Court granted certiorari on his appeal.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Rehnquist, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 810,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership