United States Supreme Court
543 U.S. 1 (2004)
Leocal (plaintiff) immigrated to the United States in 1980 and became a permanent resident in 1987. In January 2000, he was charged with two counts of DUI causing serious bodily injury under Florida law. He pleaded guilty to both counts and was sentenced to two and a half years in prison. In November 2000, the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) began removal proceedings pursuant to section 237(a) of the Immigration and Nationalization Act of 1952 (INA), which states that any alien is deportable if convicted of an aggravated felony. In October 2001, an immigration judge found him removable and the Board of Immigration Appeals affirmed. Leocal was removed to Haiti in November 2002. In June 2003, the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit dismissed his petition for review, and the Supreme Court granted certiorari on his appeal.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Rehnquist, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 236,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.