Leonard F. v. Israel Discount Bank of New York

199 F.3d 99 (1999)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Leonard F. v. Israel Discount Bank of New York

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
199 F.3d 99 (1999)

  • Written by Alexander Hager-DeMyer, JD

Facts

Leonard F. (plaintiff) was hired by Israel Discount Bank of New York (bank) (defendant) and provided with short-term-disability and long-term-disability (LTD) coverage issued by the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (MetLife) (defendant). The LTD plan limited benefits to two years for individuals with mental disabilities but provided benefits up to age 65 for individuals with physical disabilities. Leonard became disabled due to depression and received short-term-disability benefits. Leonard eventually applied for and received LTD benefits that were cut off after the two-year time limit. Leonard filed suit against the bank and MetLife, claiming that both parties discriminated against him in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) by limiting mental-disability benefits and imposing no limits on physical-disability benefits. Leonard settled the matter with the bank, and the district court dismissed the case against MetLife for Leonard’s failure to state a claim and found that MetLife was protected by the safe-harbor provision in § 501(c) of the ADA. Leonard appealed to the Second Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Leval, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership