Life Technologies Corp. v. AB Sciex Pte.

803 F. Supp. 2d 270 (2011)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Life Technologies Corp. v. AB Sciex Pte.

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
803 F. Supp. 2d 270 (2011)

  • Written by Alexander Hager-DeMyer, JD

Facts

Life Technologies Corporation (Life Tech) (plaintiff) contracted to sell its mass-spectrometry business to an affiliate of DH Technologies Development Pte. Ltd. (DH Tech) (defendant). Life Tech and DH Tech signed a purchase agreement that included an arbitration provision stating that any dispute related to the transaction documents would be negotiated, and if the issue was not resolved, it would be arbitrated. The transaction documents included the purchase agreement and several ancillary agreements. The agreement further required DH Tech to execute or have its affiliates execute and deliver a trademark-licensing agreement. Life Tech and Applied Biosystems LLC (Biosystems) (plaintiff) licensed the trademarks to AB Sciex Pte. Ltd. (Sciex) (defendant), an affiliate of DH Tech. In the license agreement, the parties agreed to be bound by the covenants of the license agreement and the original business purchase agreement signed by DH Tech. The license agreement further provided that the entire agreement included all other documents that referenced it, and that Life Tech and Biosystems would be entitled to enforce the license agreement by injunction in the event of Sciex’s breach, without prejudice to any other rights or remedies. Life Tech and Biosystems filed suit for breach of the license agreement against Sciex and breach of the purchase agreement against DH Tech. Life Tech and Biosystems sought a preliminary injunction, which the court denied. Life Tech and Biosystems then filed to compel arbitration with both parties. Sciex filed a motion to enjoin arbitration, stating that it never entered into an arbitration agreement with the parties.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Holwell, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership