Lock v. Falkenstine
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals
380 P.2d 278 (1963)
- Written by Haley Gintis, JD
Facts
The State of Oklahoma pursued criminal charges against Richard Allen Lock (defendant) for gamecock fighting in violation of Title 21 O.S.A. § 1682. Section 1682 prohibited individuals from engaging in animal fighting. In response to the charges, Lock filed a writ of prohibition in the court of criminal appeals against the county judge, Allen Falkenstine. Lock filed the writ of prohibition on the ground that the legislature had not intended to criminalize gamecock fighting by enacting Section 1682.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Nix, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 964,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,006 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,006 law school casebooks.

