Lord Sackville’s Case
Court of Chancery
28 Eng. Rep. 940 (1760)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Lord George Sackville (defendant) was an officer in the British Army. After Sackville retired from the military, military authorities wanted to charge Sackville with insubordination for actions he took during a battle while he was still in the Army. The Court of Chancery was asked whether a court-martial, i.e., military court, could exercise personal jurisdiction over Sackville, now that he was retired, for charges relating to the alleged insubordination that occurred while he was still in the military.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.