Lorman v. City of Rutland
Vermont Supreme Court
207 Vt. 598, 193 A.3d 1174, 2018 VT 64 (2018)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
Various homeowners, including Keith and Jackie Lorman (plaintiffs) experienced sewage backups. The homeowners brought a tort action against the City of Rutland (city) (defendant), alleging negligence in the design, construction, maintenance, and repair of the city’s antiquated sewer lines, as well as nuisance, trespass, and takings claims. The main focus of the case was the city’s decision to slip-line the pipes (a process involving the insertion of polyethylene sleeve), which the homeowners deemed an inadequate solution. The city moved for summary judgment on numerous grounds, including immunity. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the city. The homeowners appealed to the Vermont Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Reiber, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
