Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Mottley
United States Supreme Court
211 U.S. 149 (1908)
- Written by DeAnna Swearingen, LLM
Facts
In 1871, Erasmus and Annie Mottley (plaintiffs) were injured in a railway accident. The Mottleys asserted claims against Louisville & Nashville Railroad (the railroad) (defendant) for their injuries, and the railroad settled those claims by giving the Mottleys a lifetime pass for free transportation on its line. Decades later, Congress became concerned that railroads were using free passes to bribe public officials and passed a statute forbidding free railroad passes entirely. The next year, the railroad refused to renew the Mottleys’ free passes. The Mottleys sued the railroad in federal district court, alleging a state-law breach-of-contract claim. The parties were not diverse, but the Mottleys asserted that the federal court had subject-matter jurisdiction through federal-question jurisdiction. Specifically, the Mottleys’ complaint alleged that (1) the new federal statute did not apply to their free passes and (2) if the new statute was not a defense for the railroad because the new statute did apply to their passes, the statute was an unconstitutional taking that violated the Fifth Amendment. The trial court entered judgment for the Mottleys. The railroad appealed to the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Moody, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 964,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,006 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,006 law school casebooks.




