Lucas v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Indiana Supreme Court
953 N.E.2d 457 (2011)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Mary Beth and Perry Lucas (defendants) obtained a home loan in exchange for a mortgage. U.S. Bank, N.A. (plaintiff) acquired the mortgagor’s interest and brought suit to foreclose on the loan. The Lucases (1) asserted several affirmative defenses, including ineffective assignment of a promissory note, violation of federal lending statutes, civil conversion, and breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing; (2) filed two counterclaims against the bank: breach of contract and breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing; and (3) filed several third-party claims against Litton, the servicer of the loan, including breach of contract, breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing, violation of federal lending statutes, and civil conversion. The Lucases filed a demand for a jury trial on their legal claims. The bank filed a motion to strike the jury demand. The court granted the bank’s motion. The court of appeals reversed. The bank appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (David, J.)
Dissent (Dickson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.