Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
Supreme Court of California
603 P.2d 425 (1979)
The widow and son (Heirs) (plaintiffs) of Bela Lugosi, the actor who played the role of Dracula in several feature films, brought an action against Universal Pictures Company, Inc. (Universal) (defendant) to recover profits generated by licensing the use of Lugosi’s likeness for merchandising purposes. The trial court determined that the contract between Lugosi and Universal only entitled Universal to use Lugosi’s likeness in the motion pictures and related advertisements and did not cover separate merchandising. The trial court determined that Universal had infringed upon Lugosi’s right of publicity, and held in favor of the Heirs. Universal appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
Dissent (Bird, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 177,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.