From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...
Lujan v. National Wildlife Federation
United States Supreme Court
497 U.S. 871 (1990)
The Secretary of the Department of Interior (defendant) delegated activities concerning the withdrawal of federal lands from research development to the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). The National Wildlife Federation (NWF) (plaintiff) challenged BLM’s implementation of its “land withdrawal review program” on the grounds that it violated the Federal Land Policy and Management Act and the National Environmental Policy Act. To establish its standing to pursue the litigation, NWF submitted multiple affidavits from its members. Four of these affidavits alleged standing on the ground that the “land withdrawal review program” itself harmed the individual members. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Scalia, J.)
Dissent (Blackmun, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.