Lum v. Rice

275 U.S. 78 (1927)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Lum v. Rice

United States Supreme Court
275 U.S. 78 (1927)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD
Play video

Facts

Gong Lum (plaintiff), a taxpaying resident of Mississippi in the Rosedale school district of Bolivar County, sought to enroll his nine-year-old Chinese American daughter, Martha Lum, in Rosedale’s public school for white children. The school refused to enroll Martha on account of her being Chinese. The Mississippi constitution required the collection of appropriate taxes so that all educable children could attend a public school in their county. Although not in Rosedale, there was a separate public school in Bolivar County maintained for non-white children, which Martha could conveniently attend. Lum sued various state and school officials (defendants), alleging that Martha was entitled to attend the school in Rosedale. The trial court agreed with Lum and ordered a writ of mandamus to the state. On appeal, the Mississippi Supreme Court decided in the state’s favor because Martha was not white under the state constitution, but rather, a member of a colored race who could attend the public school for colored children in Bolivar County. Lum appealed to the United States Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Taft, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership