Lux v. Haggin
California Supreme Court
69 Cal. 255, 10 P. 674 (1886)
- Written by Oni Harton, JD
Facts
Lux (plaintiff) and Haggin (defendant) only had the rights that were recognized by acts of Congress. Haggin began appropriating water from the disputed water source in 1875. Lux acquired his riparian land from the state, which had acquired the rights from the federal government in 1882.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (McKinstry, J.)
Dissent (Ross, J.)
Dissent (Myrick, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.