Lynn v. Seby
North Dakota Supreme Court
151 N.W. 31 (1915)
The plaintiff contracted to thresh all of the defendant’s grain, including wheat, oats, and flax. The plaintiff neglected to thresh the flax. The defendant paid the plaintiff part of the money due on the contract. The plaintiff sued to recover the balance. The defendant countersued for damages resulting from the flax being subjected to the winter weather without being threshed. The trial court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, awarding a small amount due for the plaintiff’s threshing. The trial court ruled that the damage to the flax due to the weather constituted unrecoverable consequential damages. The defendant appealed, arguing that the plaintiff should not be entitled to recover for his part performance due to his breach.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Goss, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.