Lyon v. Whisman
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
45 F.3d 758 (1995)
- Written by Heather Whittemore, JD
Facts
Patricia A. Lyon (plaintiff) worked as a bookkeeper for Whisman & Associates (Whisman) (defendant). At the end of 1988, Lyon complained that Whisman never paid her an agreed-upon bonus. In 1989 Whisman threatened to permanently withhold the bonus if Lyon left the company. Eventually Whisman paid Lyon a bonus that was less than the promised amount, and Lyon left the job. After she left, Lyon filed a lawsuit in federal district court alleging that Whisman violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) by failing to pay her overtime wages, violated state contract law by threatening to withhold a vested bonus, and violated state tort law by paying a smaller bonus than promised. Lyon and the district court believed the district court had federal-question jurisdiction over the FLSA claim and, under 28 U.S.C. § 1367, had pendent jurisdiction over the state-law claims. At trial, Lyon won on all counts. Whisman appealed the state tort claim.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Greenberg, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
