M. Farbman & Sons, Inc. v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.

62 N.Y.2d 75, 476 N.Y.S.2d 69, 464 N.E.2d 437 (1984)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

M. Farbman & Sons, Inc. v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.

New York Court of Appeals
62 N.Y.2d 75, 476 N.Y.S.2d 69, 464 N.E.2d 437 (1984)

Facts

M. Farbman & Sons, Inc. (Farbman) (plaintiff) contracted with the New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation (HHC) (defendant) to provide plumbing services. Farbman and the HHC subsequently had a dispute regarding cost overruns. Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law (FOIL), Farbman requested 14 categories of records from the HHC. When the HHC denied Farbman’s request, Farbman brought an Article 78 proceeding, seeking to compel the HHC to comply with his request. The HHC responded that Farbman was not entitled to the records because (1) Farbman sought to circumvent Article 31 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR) by attempting to use FOIL to obtain documents for an anticipated litigation and (2) Farbman’s requests were too broad and unspecific. The supreme court ordered the HHC to produce the records and rejected the HHC’s reargument motion based on Farbman’s subsequent breach-of-contract suit against the HHC. The appellate division reversed, holding that it was improper to use FOIL to further pending litigation and that the FOIL demand exceeded the scope of a proper Article 31 document demand. Farbman appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kaye, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership