From our private database of 39,700+ case briefs...
Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Hunt
United States Supreme Court
320 U.S. 430, 64 S. Ct. 208, 88 L. Ed. 149, 150 A.L.R. 413 (1943)
Facts
Hunt (plaintiff), a Louisiana citizen and employee of a Louisiana employer, Magnolia Petroleum Co. (Magnolia) (defendant), was injured while working in Texas. While recovering in a Texas hospital, Hunt signed forms that amounted to an election to receive Texas workers’-compensation benefits for his injuries from the Texas State Industrial Accident Board. When Hunt returned to Louisiana, where the workers’-compensation system entitled him to greater benefits, Hunt filed a claim in Louisiana to increase his award. The Texas insurer immediately stopped making payments to Hunt and notified the Texas board. The Texas board then set a hearing date and gave Hunt notice. Hunt did not show up for the Texas hearing, and the Texas board made an award to Hunt that was the equivalent of a judgment. Thereafter, Hunt refused to accept any money from that award and filed suit against Magnolia in Louisiana. The Louisiana court awarded Hunt more than he was awarded in Texas, and Magnolia appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Stone, C.J.)
Dissent (Black, J.)
Dissent (Douglas, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 645,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 39,700 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.