Makel Textiles, Inc. v. Dolly Originals, Inc.

4 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 95, 1967 WL 8938 (1967)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
M
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Makel Textiles, Inc. v. Dolly Originals, Inc.

Supreme Court of New York
4 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 95, 1967 WL 8938 (1967)

  • Written by Mary Pfotenhauer, JD

Facts

Dolly Originals, Inc. (Dolly) (defendant), through its president and principal officer Nathan Goldberg, executed two promissory notes for $5,000 to the order of Makel Textiles, Inc. (Makel) (plaintiff), in exchange for a $10,000 loan. The endorsement on the backs of the promissory notes bore the signatures of Nathan Goldberg and Fred Kushner. Dolly also gave five $2,000 checks to Makel. The checks were signed by Goldberg. One check was paid. Another check was deposited but returned unpaid. Makel sued Dolly, Goldberg, and Kushner for the remaining loan balance of $8,000. Dolly offered no defense to the action, and judgment was entered against Dolly. Goldberg and Kushner moved to dismiss the complaint, arguing that their obligation as endorsers of the promissory notes had been discharged, because Makel had failed to present the promissory notes for payment or give notice of dishonor and nonpayment.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Spiegel, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 812,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Commercial Law

Key Terms