Maldonado v. Dominguez

137 F.3d 1 (1998)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Maldonado v. Dominguez

United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
137 F.3d 1 (1998)

KS

Facts

Miguel Maldonado (plaintiff) and other investors were invited by Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. of Puerto Rico to attend a meeting on an exclusive investment opportunity. At the meeting, Ramon Dominguez (defendant) presented information about investing in the Puerto Rico International Bank (PRIBANK). Maldonado and others invested in PRIBANK to leverage collateral with low-interest loans in order to purchase mortgages with higher interest rates. When interest rates were raised, PRIBANK could not maintain its investment strategy and failed. Maldonado filed suit against Dominguez, claiming violation of numerous securities laws and regulations including § 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933. Dominguez filed a motion to dismiss. The district court dismissed all of Maldonado’s claims and granted Dominguez’s motion to dismiss on the basis that § 17(a) did not create a cause of action that could be brought by an individual and that it was inappropriate to imply such a cause of action. Maldonado appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Torruella, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership