Maloney v. Valley Medical Facilities, Inc.

984 A. 2d 478 (2009)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
M
From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Maloney v. Valley Medical Facilities, Inc.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court
984 A. 2d 478 (2009)

JL

Facts

Max Maloney (plaintiff) sued Dr. Maurice Prendergast, Dr. Richard Brennan, and several institutional entities (defendants), alleging medical malpractice and vicarious liability for allegedly failing to timely diagnose and treat osteosarcoma in his wife. Maloney settled with Brennan before trial. The settlement agreement released Brennan and the institutional defendants, including Prendergast’s employers, from all claims. However, the settlement agreement also contained an express reservation of rights against Prendergast. Prendergast and his employers filed motions for summary judgment, arguing that, under the common-law rule governing releases, the settlement with Prendergast’s employers also released Prendergast. The trial court granted the motion, and Maloney appealed. The court of appeals reversed, and Prendergast appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Saylor, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 777,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Torts

Key Terms