Mancia v. Mayflower Textile Services Co.

253 F.R.D. 354 (2008)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Mancia v. Mayflower Textile Services Co.

United States District Court for the District of Maryland
253 F.R.D. 354 (2008)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD

Facts

Thirty-nine industrial-laundry workers including Glenda Mancia (plaintiffs) alleged Mayflower Textile Services Company and affiliates (Mayflower) (defendants) violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) by failing to pay overtime and illegally deducting wages from pay. The claimants served broad-sweeping discovery requests. Mayflower responded to multiple requests with boilerplate general objections. Discovery disputes and motions ensued. The magistrate held a hearing and noted the discovery requests might be excessive or overly burdensome given the nature of the case and relatively modest amounts claimed, but the judge could not make that determination without a factual record. Instead, the judge ordered the parties to meet and confer to resolve the discovery disputes and provided a written opinion to guide those discussions.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Grimm, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership