Mandle v. Owens
Indiana Court of Appeals
164 Ind. App. 607 (1975)
- Written by Josh Lee, JD
Facts
The Mandles (plaintiffs) enter into a contract to sell their home to the Owenses (defendants) for $30,000. The Owenses paid $300 as an earnest-money deposit, and the contract stated that if the Owenses failed to complete the purchase, the $300 would be forfeited. The Owenses decided to purchase a different home and cancelled their contract with the Mandles. The Mandles sold the home about 20 days later for $29,500. However, the Mandles needed to use a realtor for that second sale and incurred additional expenses to refinance their loan and for a motel stay. The Mandles sued the Owenses for breach of contract. The trial court ruled that the Mandles had suffered no injury and entered judgment for the Owenses. The Mandles appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lowdermilk, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 964,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,006 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,006 law school casebooks.
