Mangini v. Aerojet-General Corp.
California Court of Appeal
230 Cal. App. 3d 1125 (1991)

- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
Aerojet-General Corporation (defendant) leased 2,400 acres of land. The terms of the lease were unclear as to what the lessor permitted Aerojet-General to do on the property. After the lease expired, Catherine Mangini (plaintiff) bought the property and found that it was contaminated with hazardous waste. Mangini blamed Aerojet-General and sued to recover the costs of government-mandated soil testing and environmental cleanup. Mangini alleged, among other things, that by creating conditions injurious to public health and to Mangini’s enjoyment of her land, Aerojet-General violated California’s nuisance statute, which broadened the common-law definition of public and private nuisances and prohibited the creation of such nuisances. Mangini also alleged that Aerojet-General committed trespass by using the property for activities that the lease did not authorize and by failing to clean up the property as the lease required. The trial court sustained Aerojet-General’s demurrer to all counts for failure to state a claim and as time-barred by the statute of limitations. The court also refused leave for Mangini to amend her pleadings. Mangini appealed to the California Court of Appeal.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Sims, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.