Maplewood Bank & Trust v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
625 A.2d 537 (1993)
- Written by DeAnna Swearingen, LLM
Facts
Edward and Terre Capers (defendant) borrowed money from Maplewood Bank & Trust (Maplewood) (plaintiff) to buy real estate. Capers gave Maplewood a purchase money mortgage. The Capers then bought new kitchen from Sears, Roebuck & Company (Sears) (defendant) and gave Sears a purchase-money security interest (PMSI) in the kitchen appliances and goods. Sears made a fixture filing to perfect its interest. The capers then took out a loan from New Jersey Savings Bank (defendant) and executed a second mortgage on the property. The Capers defaulted. Maplewood demanded payment of the remaining balance of its loan and sued for foreclosure when the Capers failed to pay off the note. Sears counterclaimed, arguing that its PMSI had priority over Maplewood’s mortgage and seeking to recover out of Maplewood’s foreclosure funds. Sears’s claim was dismissed. After the foreclosure, Sears appealed its dismissal from the suit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Coleman, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.