Marathon Pipe Line Co. v. Drilling Rig Rowan/Odessa

761 F.2d 229 (1985)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Marathon Pipe Line Co. v. Drilling Rig Rowan/Odessa

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
761 F.2d 229 (1985)

Facts

A drilling rig owned by Rowan Companies (Rowan) (plaintiff) damaged an underwater pipeline owned by Marathon Pipe Line Company (Marathon). The rig was a vessel traversing the Gulf of Mexico, and the pipeline was a fixed structure on the seabed off the coast of Louisiana. Marathon made reasonable efforts to repair the pipeline. However, a part made by HydroTech Systems, Inc. (HydroTech) (defendant) that was used in the repairs proved defective, leading to further damage. Marathon sued Rowan in district court for the full cost of the repair, including the extra costs attributable to the defective HydroTech part. Rowan agreed to a settlement in which it would pay the full cost. Rowan then sought indemnification under general maritime law from HydroTech for the portion of the costs attributable to the defective part. The district court held that because HydroTech’s liability to Marathon arose from state law rather than maritime law, Rowan could not demand indemnification from HydroTech. Rowan appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Rubin, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 806,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership