Maready v. The City of Winston-Salem

467 S.E.2d 615 (1996)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Maready v. The City of Winston-Salem

North Carolina Supreme Court
467 S.E.2d 615 (1996)

  • Written by Galina Abdel Aziz , JD

Facts

A North Carolina law authorized local governments to make economic-development incentive grants to private corporations. Winston-Salem (city) and Forsyth County (county) (defendants) made 24 development incentive projects, which totaled $13,200,000 in projected investments. The city and the county levied taxes on property owners to fund the investments and estimated an increase of $238,593,000 in the local tax base and the creation of over 5,500 jobs. The expenditures were delivered as reimbursements to the recipients. William F. Maready (plaintiff) sued the city and county, challenging the 24 projects and alleging that the law was unconstitutional because it violated the public-purpose clause of the state constitution. The trial court held that the law violated the public-purpose clause of the state constitution. The city appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Whichard, J.)

Dissent (Orr, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership