Marriage of Beltran
Court of Appeal of California
227 Cal. Rptr. 924 (1986)
Mrs. Beltran (plaintiff) and Mr. Beltran (defendant) had been married during Mr. Beltran's service as a colonel in the Army. Mrs. Beltran filed for divorce, and the trial court found that the portion of Mr. Beltran's retirement pension and leave that was community property was valued at $117,000 and $5,115, respectively. During the divorce action, Mr. Beltran was convicted of a felony crime, and the military court took away all of Mr. Beltran’s pension and other benefits and dismissed him from the Army. The trial court in the divorce action assigned the value of the military benefits to Mr. Beltran and modified the property-distribution order so that Mrs. Beltran received additional property valued at one-half the total valuation. Mr. Beltran appealed the trial court's ruling.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Newsom, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.