Court of Appeals of California
226 Cal. Rptr. 766 (1986)
Jerome Frick (plaintiff) owned a parcel of real estate that was the site of the Mikado Hotel and Restaurant. The real estate was subject to a mortgage payable to Transamerica. The Mikado Hotel paid rent to Jerome’s personal account both before and during his marriage to Hiroko Frick (defendant). Jerome then paid the mortgage payments to Transamerica from his personal account as well. Although it changed over time, the rent paid into Jerome's account from Mikado was always greater than the amount of the mortgage payment from Jerome's account to Transamerica. Jerome brought an action to determine, among other issues, an allocation of community and separate property. The trial court determined that the mortgage payments that reduced the principal due to Transamerica were made from community property. Jerome appealed the trial court's decision.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Johnson, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.