Masi v. Mythical Entertainment

2020 WL 233817 (2020)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
M
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Masi v. Mythical Entertainment

United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
2020 WL 233817 (2020)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Play video

Facts

Attorney Richard Liebowitz had already appeared pro hac vice in three other cases in the Eastern District of North Carolina in 2019 when he filed notices to appear representing Alessandro Masi and Steve Sands (plaintiffs) in consolidated cases against Mythical Entertainment and Epicstream, LLC (defendants). Opposing counsel promptly filed a motion to disqualify Liebowitz under the local rules, which prohibited appearing pro hac vice more than three times a year without a good reason. The court ordered Liebowitz to show cause why it should not disqualify him. Liebowitz filed a response explaining that the cases were “simple” actions, that all but two had settled, and that he had retained local counsel. Liebowitz also argued that no showing had been made that he was not competent to handle the cases, but the court noted multiple deficiencies in four of them, and one deficiency remained outstanding. In the alternative, Liebowitz asked the court to allow another attorney from his law firm to substitute for him.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Flanagan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Legal Ethics

Key Terms