Matarazzo v. Millers Mutual Group, Inc.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
927 A.2d 689 (2007)
- Written by Josh Lee, JD
Facts
Lucy and Vincent Matarazzo (plaintiffs) owned a vacant piece of property. In June 2003, the Matarazzos instructed the Municipal Authority of Westmoreland County (Authority) (defendant) to turn off the water at the property. An employee of the Authority stated that the water would be turned off, and the Matarazzos received a bill that noted this was the final statement from the Authority. The water was not turned off, and the pipes froze and burst during the subsequent cold weather. The property suffered damage as a result of the pipes bursting, and the Matarazzos sued the Authority for detrimental reliance. The Authority moved to dismiss the lawsuit, alleging immunity from tort actions under the governmental-immunity statute. The trial court granted the motion to dismiss, and the Matarazzos appealed to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Friedman, J.)
Dissent (Leavitt, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.