Matherson v. Marchello

100 A.D.2d 233 (1984)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Matherson v. Marchello

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division
100 A.D.2d 233 (1984)

  • Written by Mary Pfotenhauer, JD

Facts

During a radio interview, members of the band The Good Rats (defendants) made remarks about Matherson (plaintiff), including that they used to “fool around with his wife.” A member of the band also said of Matherson that “it was when somebody started messing around with his boyfriend that he really freaked out.” Mr. and Mrs. Matherson sued The Good Rats and their record company, claiming that the two statements were defamatory and seeking compensatory and punitive damages for humiliation, mental anguish, loss of reputation, injury to their marriage, and loss of customers, business opportunities, and professional good will. The trial court granted The Good Rats’ motion to dismiss, finding that the statements were not susceptible to any defamatory meaning, and that the Mathersons had failed to plead special damages in their complaint.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Titone, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 802,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership