Mathews v. United States
United States Supreme Court
458 U.S. 58 (1988)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
The United States government (plaintiff) prosecuted Mathews (defendant) for accepting a bribe. Mathews was a Small Business Administration official in charge of providing aid to certain businesses. Mathews refused to aid one such business until the business's owner loaned him money. At the instigation of federal agents, the owner offered Mathews a bribe. Mathews accepted the bribe and the agents arrested him. At trial, Mathews claimed the agents entrapped him, and denied having acted with guilty intent. Because guilty intent was an element of the crime of accepting a bribe, the judge refused to instruct the jury on entrapment. The jury convicted Mathews. After an appellate court upheld Mathews's conviction, he appealed to the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rehnquist, C.J.)
Concurrence (Scalia, J.)
Concurrence (Brennan, J.)
Dissent (White, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.