Matissek v. Waller

51 So.3d 625 (2011)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Matissek v. Waller

Florida District Court of Appeal
51 So.3d 625 (2011)

RW

Facts

Roland Waller (plaintiff) and Joseph Gerhard Matissek (defendant) owned neighboring lots in a subdivision, first platted in April 1971, that permitted lot owners to build aircraft hangars on their properties. In May 1971, the subdivision's developer recorded a second plat, which described restrictive covenants applicable to all subdivision lots. One of the covenants required all structures to have masonry walls. In November 1977, the developer explicitly retained the masonry-wall restriction in a public record that updated the covenants. The developer deeded Matissek's property to its original owner in 1974. The deed referred to the April 1971 plat and stated that the property was "subject to easements and restrictions of record," but neither the 1974 deed nor any deed conveying the property to its subsequent owners cited the May 1971 plat or the November 1977 record. In the summer of 2007, Matissek began erecting a metal-sided hangar, and in January 2008 Waller sued Matissek to enforce the masonry-wall requirement. The trial court denied Matissek's motion for summary judgment, and Matissek appealed to the Florida District Court of Appeal.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Crenshaw, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 741,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 741,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 741,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership