Matter of County of Monroe

72 N.Y.2d 338, 533 N.Y.S.2d 702, 530 N.E.2d 202 (1988)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Matter of County of Monroe

New York Court of Appeals
72 N.Y.2d 338, 533 N.Y.S.2d 702, 530 N.E.2d 202 (1988)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

The County of Monroe (the county) (defendant) owned and operated the Greater Rochester International Airport, which was located entirely within the county as well as within two townships and the City of Rochester (the city) (plaintiff). In the 1980s, the county sought to expand the airport, install improvements, and add parking and other facilities, all of which would be located in the city as well as the county. The county engaged in a planning and public-hearing process and approved the project. The county applied to the city for a site-plan review. After the city questioned an environmental aspect of the project, the county responded that the application had been submitted solely out of courtesy and that the planned land use was governmental in function and immune from the city’s oversight. The city filed suit, alleging that the county’s use of land as an airport was a proprietary function and thus subject to city oversight. The trial court determined that the county airport was not subject to the city’s land-use oversight. The city appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bellacosa, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership