Matter of Einstoss

26 N.Y.2d 181, 309 N.Y.S.2d 184, 257 N.E.2d 637 (1970)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Matter of Einstoss

New York Court of Appeals
26 N.Y.2d 181, 309 N.Y.S.2d 184, 257 N.E.2d 637 (1970)

Facts

Sigmond Einstoss purchased property in Alaska (defendant) in 1951, when Alaska was still a territory. The property was subject to a $25,000 mortgage. Einstoss defaulted on that mortgage and also did not pay property-related taxes. Alaska filed a lien against the property, and the lender brought a foreclosure action against Einstoss and Alaska in territorial court. Einstoss was in Washington and thus was not subject to personal jurisdiction in Alaska. Nevertheless, Einstoss appeared in the foreclosure proceeding and admitted he owed $11,000 on the mortgage upon the lender’s representation that the lender would satisfy any judgment from the property’s sale proceeds. Two days later, Alaska filed a cross-complaint against Einstoss regarding the unpaid taxes. At Alaska’s request, the court issued an order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1655 authorizing Alaska to serve its complaint on Einstoss wherever Einstoss could be found. Alaska served Einstoss in Washington. Einstoss died the day before his answer to Alaska’s complaint was due. However, Alaska, which did not know that Einstoss had died, obtained a default order against Einstoss based on Einstoss’s failure to respond. Ultimately, the territorial court issued judgment against Einstoss for more than $95,000 on Alaska’s tax claim. Alaska sold the property for approximately $30,000 in 1961. In 1965, Alaska made a demand on the administrator of Einstoss’s New York estate (administrator) (plaintiff) for the estate to pay the difference between the property’s sale proceeds and Alaska’s judgment. The administrator filed suit in New York state court to disallow Alaska’s claim. The trial court disallowed Alaska’s claim; the appellate division affirmed. Alaska appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Fuld, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership