Matter of Extradition of Demjanjuk

612 F. Supp. 544 (1985)

From our private database of 47,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Matter of Extradition of Demjanjuk

United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
612 F. Supp. 544 (1985)

Facts

John Demjanjuk (defendant) was born in the Ukraine but had been living in the United States as a naturalized citizen since 1958. In 1983, Israel requested extradition of Demjanjuk in order to charge him with committing war crimes and crimes against humanity. Specifically, Israel alleged that Demjanjuk had murdered Jews while working with the Nazis during World War II. An Israeli law passed to prosecute Nazis and Nazi collaborators gave Israel jurisdiction to hear these charges regardless of where the murders had occurred and even if Demjanjuk had no connection to Israel. Pursuant to the terms of an extradition treaty between the United States and Israel, the federal government filed a lawsuit in a federal district court seeking an order extraditing Demjanjuk to Israel. Demjanjuk objected that extradition was improper because Israel lacked jurisdiction to charge him, a noncitizen with no ties to Israel, with crimes that allegedly occurred entirely outside Israel. The district court considered the extradition request.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Battisti, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 913,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 913,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,300 briefs, keyed to 999 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 913,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,300 briefs - keyed to 999 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership