Matter of Lozada
Board of Immigration Appeals
19 I. & N. Dec 637 (1988)
Lozada (plaintiff), a legal permanent resident, was found deportable for having been convicted of a crime. He applied for relief under (former) § 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, and alternatively for voluntary departure. The Immigration Judge denied § 212(c) relief and found Lozada ineligible for voluntary departure because of the conviction. Lozada appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals (the Board) (defendant). The Board ordered summary dismissal because Lozada’s counsel had inadequately specified the grounds for appeal in the notice of appeal, and failed to file a brief that he promised. Lozada petitioned the court of appeals for review. While the petition was pending, he filed a motion to the Board to reopen his removal proceeding, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 723,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 723,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.