Matter of Munford, Inc., d.b.a. Majik Market, Debtor
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
97 F.3d 456 (1996)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
The Panfida Group (Panfida) made an offer to purchase all outstanding stock in Munford, Inc. (plaintiff) through a leveraged-buyout merger. Panfida created Alabama Acquisition Corporation and Alabama Merger Corporation as vehicles for the buyout. Munford’s board of directors (the directors) (defendants) accepted the offer, the shareholders gave their approval, and the sale was closed. The following year, the Panfida-owned Munford filed for Chapter 11 in bankruptcy court and sought to recover damages against various parties involved in the buyout, including the directors of Munford. The court determined that the directors had violated Georgia’s stock distribution and repurchase statute, which prohibited stock distributions or repurchases that render a corporation insolvent. The case was appealed to federal district court, which adopted the bankruptcy court’s report and recommendations. The directors moved for summary judgment, which was denied. The directors appealed, contending that the statute in question only applied to situations in which control of a company did not change hands. The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hatchett, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.