Maurice O'Meara Co. v. National Park Bank of New York
New York Court of Appeals
239 N.Y. 386, 146 N.E. 636 (1925)
- Written by Ryan McCarthy, JD
Facts
Sun-Herald had a letter of credit issued in favor of Maurice O’Meara Company’s assignor, Ronconi & Millar (Ronconi) (plaintiff), by National Park Bank of New York (National) (defendant) for payment for newsprint paper. National was to make payment on presentment by Ronconi of an invoice and shipping documents for each shipment of paper. Ronconi presented documents that satisfied the requirements of the letter of credit for multiple shipments, and National refused to make payment. Ronconi sued for damages. National contended that payment did not have to be made, because Ronconi failed to present proof to National that the paper delivered was of the correct weight and strength, as agreed upon in the contract with Sun-Herald, and that the paper delivered was, in fact, not the correct weight and strength. Ronconi moved for summary judgment and was denied by the trial court. The denial was affirmed by appellate division. The Court of Appeals of New York granted review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (McLaughlin, J.)
Dissent (Cardozo, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
