Florida Court of Appeals
483 So.2d 772 (1986)
The seller entered into a contract to sell his land to the purchaser. After entering into this contract, but prior to closing on the purchase, the seller sold fill from the land to a third party for $240,000. The purchaser sued the seller, seeking the full amount of the proceeds from the sale of the fill. The trial court ruled that the purchaser had been damaged, but the trial court calculated the damages based on a pro-rata amount in relation to the acreage lost by removing the fill. The trial court determined that 25 acres had been lost, which constituted $122,067 of the purchase price. The purchaser appealed to the Florida Court of Appeals.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Letts, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 219,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.