McCann v. McCann

275 P.3d 824 (2012)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

McCann v. McCann

Idaho Supreme Court
275 P.3d 824 (2012)

SC

Facts

Ron McCann (plaintiff) and Bill McCann (defendant) were brothers and each owned 36.7 percent of the shares of McCann Ranch & Livestock Company. Their mother, Gertrude McCann, owned the remaining shares. After the death of Ron and Bill’s father, Bill’s salary nearly tripled, Gertrude started to receive a consulting fee from the company, and Ron was removed from the company’s board of directors. Ron was not otherwise employed by the company. Further, the company bought Gertrude’s home from her because she was in need of immediate cash. Ron brought suit, seeking dissolution of the company. The company moved for summary judgment. The company acknowledged that there could be a factual dispute regarding the oppressiveness of Gertrude and Bill’s conduct, but that the lack of irreparable injury to the company was determinative. The trial court granted the company’s motion. Ron appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Burdick, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 807,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership