McCarty v. Pheasant Run, Inc.

826 F.2d 1554 (1987)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

McCarty v. Pheasant Run, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
826 F.2d 1554 (1987)

Play video

Facts

While staying as a guest of the Pheasant Run Lodge (the Lodge) (defendant), Dula McCarty (plaintiff) was attacked and beaten by a man in a mask who had broken into her second-story room. McCarty was able to fight off the intruder, and the man fled. It was later determined that the intruder entered McCarty’s room through an unlocked sliding-glass door, which was accessible by stairs. McCarty filed suit in federal district court based on diversity of citizenship against the Lodge, alleging negligence. At trial, McCarty argued that the Lodge could have taken a number of additional safety precautions, but she failed to indicate whether the increased cost would not outweigh the benefit to guests staying at the Lodge. The jury found for the Lodge. The district court denied McCarty’s motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. McCarty appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Posner, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 777,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership