Supreme Court of Montana
96 P.3d 697 (2004)
Joan McCormick (plaintiff) and Clark Brevig (defendant) were 50/50 partners in a ranching partnership. Their relationship deteriorated over time, and it ultimately became impossible for them to cooperate on business matters. McCormick sued Brevig, alleging he had taken partnership property for his own use, and seeking an accounting. McCormick also requested an order mandating the dissolution and winding up of the partnership business. The trial court ordered that the partnership be dissolved and wound up. It determined McCormick’s share in the partnership to be worth $1,107,672, and ordered Brevig to pay McCormick that amount. McCormick refused to accept the payment and appealed the order, arguing that the partnership assets must be sold and the proceeds distributed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 237,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.