McCormick v. Brevig
Supreme Court of Montana
2004 MT 179, 322 Mont. 112, 96 P.3d 697 (2004)
- Written by John Caddell, JD
Facts
Joan McCormick (plaintiff) and Clark Brevig (defendant) were 50/50 partners in a ranching partnership. Their relationship deteriorated over time, and it ultimately became impossible for them to cooperate on business matters. McCormick sued Brevig, alleging he had taken partnership property for his own use, and seeking an accounting. McCormick also requested an order mandating the dissolution and winding up of the partnership business. The trial court ordered that the partnership be dissolved and wound up. It determined McCormick’s share in the partnership to be worth $1,107,672, and ordered Brevig to pay McCormick that amount. McCormick refused to accept the payment and appealed the order, arguing that the partnership assets must be sold and the proceeds distributed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.