McDonald v. John P. Scripps Newspaper
California Court of Appeal
257 Cal. Rptr. 473 (1989)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
Gavin McDonald (plaintiff), a minor, entered a spelling bee sponsored by John P. Scripps Newspaper (Scripps) (defendant) and lost to another contestant when he misspelled a word. Scripps’s judges had previously disqualified that contestant for a misspelling but reinstated him when they learned that the contestant had correctly spelled the word’s accepted variant form. McDonald sued Scripps through a guardian ad litem, who alleged that the contest rules constituted a contract between Scripps and contest participants, that Scripps breached the contract by improperly reinstating McDonald’s opponent, and that McDonald’s loss so humiliated and mortified him that he was entitled to recover both compensatory and punitive damages. The trial court sustained a demurrer to McDonald’s complaint and denied leave to amend.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gilbert, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
