McDonald v. State

2015 WL 1407832, No. 02-14-00113-CR (2015)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

McDonald v. State

Texas Court of Appeals
2015 WL 1407832, No. 02-14-00113-CR (2015)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

Joe McDonald (defendant) distributed methamphetamine. A Hood County Sherriff’s Department (HCSD) officer repeatedly called and texted McDonald about purchasing methamphetamine and ultimately purchased methamphetamine from McDonald. McDonald was arrested, and the State of Texas charged him with delivery of methamphetamine. McDonald entered a guilty plea and was sentenced to 40 years in prison. McDonald subsequently appealed, arguing that his guilty plea was involuntary because it was the product of ineffective assistance of counsel. In relevant part, McDonald argued that he received ineffective counsel because his attorney failed to advise McDonald about the availability of an entrapment defense.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Dauphinot, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership