From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...
McDonald v. Yarchenko
United States District Court for the District of Oregon
81 UCC Rep. Serv. 2d 165 (2013)
McDonald (plaintiff) and Yarchenko (defendant) were both members of a limited liability company (the LLC). McDonald loaned Yarchenko $22,000 and the parties signed a promissory note. The loan was secured by Yarchenko’s interest in the LLC, which was valued at more than $400,000. Yarchenko defaulted on the loan. McDonald sent Yarchenko an unconditional proposal after the default, proposing he would accept the collateral of Yarchenko’s interest in the LLC in full satisfaction of the loan. Yarchenko did not respond to the proposal. McDonald executed a strict foreclosure on the promissory note. McDonald brought suit against Yarchenko to recover the loan and accrued interest.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Hernandez, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 519,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 519,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.