McGinnis v. Northland Ready Mix, Inc.

344 S.W.3d 804 (2011)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

McGinnis v. Northland Ready Mix, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals
344 S.W.3d 804 (2011)

Facts

Northland Ready Mix, Inc. (Northland) (defendant) owned a cement plant that adjoined two parcels of land owned by Rhonda McGinnis (plaintiff). One parcel of McGinnis’s land included a repair shop, and the other parcel of McGinnis’s land included a home, which McGinnis rented to tenants. McGinnis sued Northland for temporary nuisance, alleging that, for a period of 178 months, water containing gravel, sand, and cement had overflowed Northland’s facility and run onto McGinnis’s land. The water had deposited sediment and prevented McGinnis and her tenants from driving onto the property. At trial, McGinnis presented evidence that Northland’s negligence had caused more than $178,000 in damages, including lost market rental value of $92,753 for her two properties while the nuisance existed. McGinnis did not present any evidence of actual rental losses caused by the nuisance. A jury found Northland liable for temporary nuisance and awarded McGinnis $50,000 in damages caused by the water, dust, and noise. Northland appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Smart, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership