McGraw v. St. Joseph's Hospital

488 S.E.2d 389 (1997)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

McGraw v. St. Joseph’s Hospital

West Virginia Supreme Court
488 S.E.2d 389 (1997)

Facts

Robert McGraw (plaintiff) entered the emergency room of St. Joseph’s Hospital (St. Joseph’s) (defendant), complaining of shortness of breath. Eventually, McGraw was admitted to the hospital as an inpatient. The following morning, four female hospital personnel attempted to assist McGraw, who was quite heavy, into bed. However, the ladies dropped McGraw onto the floor. Several days later, McGraw was discovered on the floor near his bed. Again, four female nurses and aides dropped McGraw why trying to place him into bed. On each fall, McGraw suffered injuries. McGraw filed suit against St. Joseph’s alleging that hospital personnel were negligent in dropping or permitting him to fall on two occasions. After discovery, St. Joseph’s moved for summary judgment premised on McGraw’s failure to produce expert medical testimony demonstrating how the hospital deviated from the appropriate standard of care. The trial court granted St. Joseph’s motion and dismissed the complaint. The trial court concluded that a state law required a plaintiff to establish a violation of the standard of care by a health care provider through expert testimony. McGraw appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Davis, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership