McIntosh County Bank v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP
Minnesota Supreme Court
745 N.W.2d 538 (2008)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
McIntosh County Bank (McIntosh) (plaintiff) purchased a loan from Miller & Schroeder (Miller). McIntosh did not rely on Miller’s analysis but conducted an independent analysis of the loan. Miller hired Dorsey & Whitney, LLP (Dorsey) (defendant), to represent it in securing the loan. The debtor defaulted on the loan. McIntosh brought a legal malpractice suit against Dorsey. The district court granted summary judgment to Dorsey, finding that McIntosh was neither a client of Dorsey, nor a third-party beneficiary of Dorsey’s attorney-client relationship with Miller. The court of appeals reversed. Dorsey appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Meyer, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.