McLeod v. Plymouth Court Nursing Home

957 F. Supp. 113 (1997)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

McLeod v. Plymouth Court Nursing Home

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
957 F. Supp. 113 (1997)

Facts

Clara McLeod (plaintiff) was a resident at the Plymouth Court Nursing Home (nursing home) (defendant). One day, McLeod attempted to get in her wheelchair, but she fell on the floor and broke her hip. McLeod sued the nursing home, alleging that the home’s staff had negligently left the wheelchair unlocked, which made the wheelchair unstable and caused her fall. Specifically, McLeod alleged that the nursing home had breached its duty of reasonable care. McLeod’s complaint did not include any allegations that the nursing home had failed to provide adequate medical care or had otherwise breached the standard of care for a reasonable hospital or medical facility. The nursing home moved to dismiss McLeod’s claim, arguing that (1) it was a medical-malpractice claim and (2) McLeod had not complied with the special notice requirements for filing a medical-malpractice claim. McLeod responded by contending that her claim was an ordinary negligence claim that had no special notice requirements.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Duggan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership